Insolvency proceedings/self-administration
The primary objective of the insolvency law reform (ESUG) is early restructuring of companies threatened with insolvency. The ESUG facilitates the prerequisites for court-ordered self-administration under the supervision of a trustee, who is also appointed by the court. The associated changes in the Insolvency Code require a corresponding adjustment of the insurance cover. For example, the debtor is granted up to three months, in which to draw up a restructuring plan within the framework of the protective shield procedure pursuant to § 270 InsO – under the supervision of a provisional administrator, free from enforcement measures in self-administration. This can then be implemented as an insolvency plan.
Most insurers offer insurance cover for insolvency proceedings (provisional and final insolvency administration) and self-administration via the firm’s master cover up to a maximum sum insured of €2 million or for a single explicitly designated and described procedure within the scope of property cover.
The concepts of the insurers are very different here. Particularly in the area of master cover, these concepts are subject to various practical restrictions and exclusions (e.g. in the area of commercial risks for the continuation of a business). Therefore, the individual design of the insurance cover in these procedures is highly significant. For temporal downstream risks (e.g. in the case of distribution of assets), insurance cover no longer exists after termination of the insolvency proceedings with cancellation of the property cover set up for this purpose, due to the infringement principle. To ensure that the insolvency administrator is not left out in the cold in this case, we have also found a solution for this coverage gap.
Examples of damage – insolvency administrators
- Insufficient insurance coverage to cover the insolvent company
- Establishment of avoidable bankrupt’s liabilities (e.g. in the event of continuation of operations)
- Failure to raise objection to unfounded claims
- Incorrect valuation of assets held for sale on disposal
- Preferential treatment or disadvantage of individual creditors
- Incorrect, inappropriate legal proceedings, or failure to initiate legal proceedings
Committee of creditors
In the insolvency proceedings, a member of the creditors’ committee, as part of the representation of the interests of the creditors involved, performs various monitoring, control and steering tasks, in particular with regard to the monitoring and support of the insolvency administrator (§ 71 of the Insolvency code (InsO), e.g. with regard to the continuation of companies (§§ 158, 160 InsO) and distribution of the assets involved in the insolvency proceedings (§ 187 InsO).
To cover these liability risks – compared with the usual standard covers – we can offer members of a creditors’ committee the following special conditions and extensions of cover in the form of separate creditors’ committee cover:
- No deductible if there is a claim
- Premium-free inclusion of cover for fidelity losses
- Premium-free extension of foreign cover
- Premium-free cyber coverage
- Defence protection if there is allegation of wilful breach of duty, until such time as the allegation has been legally ascertained
- Costs are not credited against the sum insured
- Premium-free integration of the supervisory board and advisory board clause
Examples of damage – creditors’ committee
- Consent to the implementation of inappropriate measures on the part of the insolvency administrator (continuation or sale of the joint and several debtor’s business, commencement or continuation of proceedings, taking out of loans)
- Insufficient audit of the insolvency administrator’s cash balance
- Inadequate supervision of the business execution of the insolvency administrator
- Approval of a preliminary distribution that is too high or refusal to approve a distribution contrary to duty
- Violation of the obligation to comply with the overall general interest